Redosificación de pena en el delito de extorsión sentencia 33.254 C.S.J.M.P. José Leónidas Bustos Martínez aplicación. Prohibición Artículo 26 de la ley 1121 de 2006 versus inaplicación de los aumentos de la ley 890 de 2004. Principio de proporcionalidad de la pena

Abstract

Jurisprudential variation against re-dosing of penalty for the crime of extortion is analyzed; inapplicability of the law 890 of 2004 along with the prohibition of Law 1121 of 2006, its scope against the criminal policy of the Colombian state; article seeks to achieve establish whether or not such a change violates the prohibition on benefits and surrogates in these crimes taking into account the weight given by domestic and international law protection against serious crimes considered; this work entailed to thoroughly analyze history and current position of the Supreme Court Criminal Chamber also observing the position of the judges against the change; this, analyzed from the point of view of their decisions establishing the right to re-dosing of sentence for those convicted of the crime of extortion having mediated acceptance of charges or pre-agreement and the jurisdiction of the court of execution of sentences for the present case managing to determine its own conception and according to the jurisprudential variation representing the need for a preventive but not totally repressive criminal law.