Desarrollo de un dispositivo de anclaje temporal (dat), para ortodoncia, en función de sus características geométricas y la densidad ósea del maxilar

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorLópez Vaca, Oscar Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Barbosa, Jorge Andrés
dc.contributor.authorZambrano, John Alexander
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000531359
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000473600
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=V0oEE7cAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao
dc.contributor.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=km7wEwIAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7020-4688
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T19:00:56Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T19:00:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-27
dc.descriptionEl uso de dispositivos de anclaje temporal (DAT) representa un avance en ortodoncia como anclaje absoluto el cual ofrece resistencia a movimientos dentales no deseados; son usados también en traumatología maxilofacial, en cirugía ortognática como fijación o como ayuda temporal en casos de prostodoncia. Comparados con anclajes tradicionales, los DAT ofrecen ventajas como: un tamaño pequeño, mínimas limitaciones anatómicas para su colocación, bajo costo, fácil colocación y retiro, ya que estos no presentan una oseointegración. El presente proyecto pretende desarrollar el diseño y manufactura de un implante que proporcione la estabilidad primaria con el hueso en función de diferentes factores de diseño propios de los DAT y de la ubicación y calidad del hueso de la zona a implantar. El diseño se realizará mediante el uso de modelos computacionales empleando el método de elementos finitos y la manufactura mediante la definición de estrategias de mecanizado para el tallado de roscas en pequeños diámetros. Los resultados del diseño se validaran en una segunda etapa mediante la realización de ensayos mecánicos y el uso de métodos propios del diseño de experimentos.spa
dc.description.abstractThe use of temporary anchorage devices (DAT) represents an advance in orthodontics as absolute anchorage which offers resistance to unwanted dental movements; They are used also in maxillofacial traumatology, orthognathic surgery as fixation or as an aid in cases of prosthodontics. Compared to traditional anchors, DATs offers advantages such as: a small size, minimal anatomical limitations for its placement, low cost, easy placement and removal, since these do not have a osseointegration. This project aims to develop the design and manufacture of a implant that provides primary stability with bone based on different DAT design factors and the location and quality of bone in the area to implant. The design is done through the use of computational models using the finite element method and manufacturing by defining strategies machining for thread cutting in small diameters. The design results are validate in a second stage by performing mechanical tests and using own methods of the design of experiments.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15332/dt.inv.2016.02676
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/28158
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.relation.referencesArsalanloo, Z., Telchi, R. & Osgouie, K. G. (2014). Selection of Optimum Thread Type in Implants to Achieve Optimal Biomechanical Properties by Using 3D Finite Element Method. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 4 (3), s. 185– 190. doi:10.7763/IJBBB.2014.V4.336spa
dc.relation.referencesBarros, S. E., Janson, G., Chiqueto, K., Garib, D. G. & Janson, M. (2011). Effect of miniimplant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140 (4), s. 181–192. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.016spa
dc.relation.referencesChe-Haron, C. H. & Jawaid, a. (2005). The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti-6% Al-4% v. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 166 (2), s. 188– 192. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.012spa
dc.relation.referencesCunha, A. C. Da, Marquezan, M., et al. (2015). Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 147 (1), s. 45–51. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.09.011spa
dc.relation.referencesCunha, A. C. Da, Freitas, A. O. A. De, Marquezan, M. & Nojima, L. I. (2015). Mechanical influence of thread pitch on orthodontic mini-implant stability. Brazilian Oral Research, 29 (1), s. 1–6. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0042spa
dc.relation.referencesGuan, H. et al. (2009). Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 24 (5), s. 866–876spa
dc.relation.referencesHanda, A., Hegde, N. & Reddy, H. V. P. (2011). Effect of the thread pitch of orthodontic mini-implant on bone stress - A 3D finite element analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 1 (4), s. 91–96.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiang, L. et al. (2009). Optimal selections of orthodontic mini-implant diameter and length by biomechanical consideration: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Advances in Engineering Software, 40 (11), s. 1124–1130. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.05.008spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, Y. K., Kim, Y. J., Yun, P. Y. & Kim, J. W. (2009). Effects of the taper shape, dualthread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. Angle Orthodontist, 79 (5), s. 908–914. doi:10.2319/071808-374.1spa
dc.relation.referencesKuroda, S., Sugawara, Y., Deguchi, T., Kyung, H. M. & Takano-Yamamoto, T. (2007). Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates and postoperative discomfort. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 131 (1), s. 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.032spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, C. L., Yu, J. H., Liu, H. L., Lin, C. H. & Lin, Y. S. (2010). Evaluation of contributions of orthodontic mini-screw design factors based on FE analysis and the Taguchi method. Journal of Biomechanics, 43 (11), s. 2174–2181. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.043spa
dc.relation.referencesMachado, G. L. (2014). Effects of orthodontic miniscrew placement angle and structure on the stress distribution at the bone miniscrew interface – A 3D finite element analysis. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research, 5 (2), s. 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.sjdr.2014.01.001spa
dc.relation.referencesMischkowski, R. a. et al. (2008). Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 37 (10), s. 948–954. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.017spa
dc.relation.referencesMotoyoshi, M., Inaba, M., Ono, a., Ueno, S. & Shimizu, N. (2009). The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38 (1), s. 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, H. S., Jeong, S. H. & Kwon, O. W. (2006). Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 130 (1), s. 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032spa
dc.relation.referencesPithon, M. M., Figueiredo, D. S. F. & Oliveira, D. D. (2013). Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 71 (3), s. 479–486. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.002spa
dc.relation.referencesReynders, R., Ronchi, L. & Bipat, S. (2009). Mini-implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135 (5), s. 564.e1–564.e19. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.026spa
dc.relation.referencesTachibana, R., Motoyoshi, M., Shinohara, a., Shigeeda, T. & Shimizu, N. (2012). Safe placement techniques for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41 (11), s. 1439–1444. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.031spa
dc.relation.referencesWilmes, B. & Drescher, D. (2009). Impact of insertion depth and predrilling diameter on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthodontist, 79 (4), s. 609–614. doi:10.2319/071708-373.1spa
dc.relation.referencesWilmes, B. & Drescher, D. (2011). Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 40 (7), s. 697–703. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.08.008spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordTemporary Anchorage Device (DAT);spa
dc.subject.keywordOrthodontic Anchorspa
dc.subject.keywordBone anchorspa
dc.subject.proposalDispositivo de Anclaje Temporal (DAT);spa
dc.subject.proposalAnclaje Ortodónticospa
dc.subject.proposalAnclaje Óseospa
dc.titleDesarrollo de un dispositivo de anclaje temporal (dat), para ortodoncia, en función de sus características geométricas y la densidad ósea del maxilarspa
dc.type.categoryApropiación Social y Circulación del Conocimiento: Evento científico con componente de apropiaciónspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Desarrollo de un dispositivo de anclaje temporal (dat), para ortodoncia.pdf
Tamaño:
1.31 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

GEAMEC