Efectividad de la intervención con biofeedback en el tratamiento conservador de la incontinencia urinaria posprostatectomía. Una revisión sistemática

dc.contributor.authorRamírez-Vélez, R.spa
dc.contributor.authorOcampo-Trujillo, A.I.spa
dc.contributor.authorMeneses-Echavez, J.F.spa
dc.coverage.campusCRAI-USTA Bogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T12:10:53Zspa
dc.date.available2020-01-21T12:10:53Zspa
dc.date.issued2014-06spa
dc.descriptionObjetivo: Determinar la efectividad de las intervenciones con biofeedback en el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria posprostatectomía. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos de CENTRAL, Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE y CINAHL. El riesgo de sesgo en los estudios incluidos fue evaluado mediante la escala PEDro (Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials). Selección de los estudios: Fueron incluidos ensayos controlados aleatorios, con pacientes adultos, con diagnóstico de incontinencia urinaria posprostatectomía que incorporaran el uso de biofeedback dentro del tratamiento conservador. Resultados: Ocho estudios cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Las intervenciones con biofeedback incluyeron el uso de instrucciones verbales y escritas, electromiografía y sonda rectal. Conclusiones: Existe evidencia limitada a favor de la efectividad del biofeedback en el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria posprostatectomía.spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the effectiveness of biofeedback for the treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted in the CENTRAL, Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL data bases. Risk of bias in the studies included was assessed with the PEDro scale (Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials). Study selection: Randomized controlled trials with adult patients diagnosed of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence involving biofeedback for the conservative management were included. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Biofeedback interventions included verbal and written instructions, electromyography and anal catheter. Conclusions: There is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of biofeedback on the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L. and SERMEF. All rights reserved.spa
dc.description.domainhttp://unidadinvestigacion.usta.edu.cospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2013.07.001spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/20877
dc.relation.referencesJemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893---7.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893---7.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohler BA, Ward E, McCarthy BJ, Schymura MJ, Ries LA, Eheman C, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:714---36.spa
dc.relation.referencesPardo C, Cendales R. Incidencia estimada y mortalidad por cáncer en Colombia 2002-2006. Bogotá:INC; 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (USA) [Consultado 5 Dic 2012]. Disponible en: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/spa
dc.relation.referencesHaylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4---20.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbrams P, Cardozo LD, Fall M, Griffiths DJ, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167---78.spa
dc.relation.referencesMilsom I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D. Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Incontinence: Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Paris: Health Publications Ltd; 2009. p. 35---112.spa
dc.relation.referencesLitwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Leach GE, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:129---35.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaab F, Yamaguchi R, Leach GE. Postprostatectomy incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1996;23:447---57.spa
dc.relation.referencesStothers L, Thom DH, Calhoun EA. Urinary incontinence in men. En: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, editores. Urologic Diseases in Americans. US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Publicación NIH N.◦ 04-5512. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office; 2004. p. 107---33.spa
dc.relation.referencesResnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:436---45.spa
dc.relation.referencesFilocamo MT, Li Marzi V, del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;48:734---8.spa
dc.relation.referencesBauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: All about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009;55:322---33.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell SE, Glazener CM, Hunter KF, Cody JD, Moore KN. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD001843.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Kampen M, de Weerdt W, van Poppel H, de Ridder D, Feys H, Baert L. Effect of pelvicfloor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;355:98---102.spa
dc.relation.referencesArmijo S, Gazzi L, Caroline I, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee D. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:156---75.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83:713---21.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48:43---9.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial board of the Cochrane Collaboration back review group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28:1290---9.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/*
dc.subject.keywordUrinary incontinencespa
dc.subject.keywordPelvic floorspa
dc.subject.keywordProstatectomyspa
dc.subject.keywordBiofeedbackspa
dc.subject.keywordInterventionsspa
dc.subject.proposalIncontinencia urinariaspa
dc.subject.proposalPiso pélvicospa
dc.subject.proposalProstatectomíaspa
dc.subject.proposalBiofeedbackspa
dc.subject.proposalIntervencionesspa
dc.titleEfectividad de la intervención con biofeedback en el tratamiento conservador de la incontinencia urinaria posprostatectomía. Una revisión sistemáticaspa
dc.type.categoryGeneración de Nuevo Conocimiento: Artículos publicados en revistas especializadas - Electrónicosspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Efectividad de la intervención con biofeedback.pdf
Tamaño:
547.06 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo SCOPUS

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Thumbnail USTA
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: