Potencial de la codigestión anaeróbica de sustratos y estiércol porcino hacia la producción de metano

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorBayona Ayala, Olga Lucía
dc.contributor.advisorBarón Rodríguez, Mario Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMeza Acosta, Karol Ibeth
dc.contributor.authorRomero Comas, Oscar Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T15:37:41Z
dc.date.available2023-03-08T15:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-07
dc.descriptionEn la actualidad gran parte de la energía empleada es obtenida de fuentes no renovables, principalmente aquellas provenientes del uso de combustibles fósiles que generan impactos negativos en el medio ambiente. En los últimos años se ha evidenciado un interés particular en el desarrollo de nuevas fuentes energéticamente eficientes y sostenibles, principalmente energías provenientes de recursos renovables o residuos agroindustriales, como materia prima. En este orden de ideas, este artículo presenta un análisis de la producción científica a nivel mundial publicadas entre 2015 y 2022, relacionados con la generación de metano a partir del estiércol porcino en codigestión con diferentes sustratos. Se realizó un análisis cienciométrico y revisión de las publicaciones indexadas en las bases de datos Scopus y Sciencedirect, lo que permitió establecer relaciones entre sustratos e inóculo y su rendimiento en producción de metano. Dicha revisión mostró que la cáscara y vainas de cacao mezclados con fracción orgánica de residuos sólidos municipales y purines de cerdo, tuvieron el rendimiento más alto (2485,91 mL/g de sólidos volátiles), seguido de la codigestión de estiércol bovino, estiércol de cuy, aguas residuales de una planta de leche e inóculo de estiércol de cerdo (671 mL/g de sólidos volátiles). Colombia cuenta con varias fuentes de biomasa residual promisorias para la generación de biogás, la valorización de esta biomasa podría mitigar el impacto ambiental y conducir una transición hacia un modelo de bioeconomíaspa
dc.description.abstractCurrently, a large part of the energy used is obtained from non-renewable sources, mainly those from the use of fossil fuels that generate negative impacts on the environment. In recent years there has been a particular interest in the development of new energy efficient and sustainable sources, mainly energy from renewable resources or agro-industrial waste, as raw material. In this order of ideas, this article presents an analysis of the worldwide scientific production published between 2015 and 2022, related to the generation of methane from pig manure in codigestion with different substrates. A scientometric analysis and review of the indexed publications in the Scopus and Sciencedirect databases were carried out, which allowed establishing relationships between substrates and inoculum and their performance in methane production. This review showed that the shell and cocoa pods mixed with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and pig slurry had the highest yield (2485.91 mL/g of volatile solids), followed by the codigestion of bovine manure, guinea pig, wastewater from a dairy plant and pig manure inoculum (671 mL/g of volatile solids). Colombia has several promising sources of residual biomass for the generation of biogas; the recovery of this biomass could mitigate the environmental impact and lead a transition towards a bioeconomy model.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.domainhttps://www.ustabuca.edu.co/spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMeza Acosta, K. I. & Romero Comas, O. F. (2023). Potencial de la codigestión anaeróbica de sustratos y estiércol porcino hacia la producción de metano multiescalar [Tesis de Maestría]. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bucaramanga, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/49844
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Bucaramangaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Química Ambientalspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría Ciencias y Tecnologías Ambientalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAangelidaki, I., Ahrin, B. K., Deng, H., & Schmidt, J. E. (2002). Anaerobic digestion of olive oil mill effluents together with swine manure in UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology, 45(10), 213 - 218. doi:10.2166/wst.2002.0334spa
dc.relation.referencesAbbas, Y., Yun, S., Wang, K., Ali Shah, F., Xing, T., & Li, B. (2021). Static-magnetic-field coupled with fly-ash accelerant: A powerful strategy to significantly enhance the mesophilic anaerobic-co-digestion. Bioresource Technology, 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124793spa
dc.relation.referencesAboudi, K., Álvarez-Gallego, C. J., & Romero-García, L. I. (2017). Influence of total solids concentration on the anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet by-products and livestock manures. Science of The Total Environment, 586, 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.01.178spa
dc.relation.referencesAdeleye, T., Yeo, H., Seth, R., Hafez, H., & Biswas, N. (2022). Influence of mix ratio of potato peel and pig manure on reaction kinetics and methane recovery from anaerobic co-digestion. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 49(5), 675-682. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0671spa
dc.relation.referencesAlonso, F., & Rodriguez, E. (2021). BMEditores. (BMEditores, Editor, F. Alonso, E. Rodriguez, Productores, & Los Porcicultores y su Entorno) Recuperado el 27 de enero de 2023, de BMEditores: https://bmeditores.mx/porcicultura/produccion-consumo-mundial-de-carne-de-cerdo/spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, J. M., Plazas, E. R., & Quintero, A. (2017). Vigilancia tecnológica del sector agroindustrial. En ENTORNOS Vol. 30 (2)spa
dc.relation.referencesBai, X., & Chen, Y.-C. (2020). Synergistic effect and supernatant nitrogen reduction from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Bioresource Technology Reports, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100424.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoltes, K., Leton, P., & Garcia-Calvo, E. (2008). Volatile fatty acid anaerobic degradation: Kinetic modeling with an inoculum under controlled conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 47(15), 5337 - 5345. doi:10.1021/ie071583pspa
dc.relation.referencesCabeza-Rojas, I., Daniela Mosquera-Tobar, J., Paula Moscoso-Díaz, M., & Sebastián Muñoz-Hernández, J. (2022). Análisis de tendencias en la recuperación de suelos empleando vigilancia tecnológica. Revista ITECKNE, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.15332/itecknespa
dc.relation.referencesCardona-Román, D. M., & Sánchez-Torres, J. M. (2017). Análisis cienciométrico de la producción científica acerca de la investigación sobre la evaluación de la implementación del e-learning en el periodo 2000-2015. Educación, 26(51), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.201702.001spa
dc.relation.referencesClarivate Analytics. (2022). Document Search Web of Science. https://www.webofscience.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesDaim, T.U., Rueda, G., Martin, H. & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 73, p. 981– 1012.spa
dc.relation.referencesElsevier B.V. (2022a). Document Search Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesElsevier B.V. (2022b). Document Search. Sciencedirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesEscalante H., Orduz J, Zapata H, Cardona MC, & Duarte M. (2011). Atlas del Potencial Energético de la Biomasa Residual en Colombia. Vol. 53. Bucaramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santanderspa
dc.relation.referencesEstrategias Urbanas y Territoriales S.L. (2021). Impacto ambiental de las granjas porcinas. Recuperado el 14 de octubre de 2022, de https://www.daimiel.es/sites/default/files/2021-05/Informe%20de%20impacto%20ambiental.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFierro, J., Martinez, E. J., Rosas, J. G., Fernández, R. A., López, R., & Gomez, X. (2016). Co-Digestion of Swine Manure and Crude Glycerine: Increasing Glycerine Ratio Results in Preferential Degradation of Labile Compounds. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 227(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2773-7spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, C. (2019). Estudio para el análisis y localización de la biomasa potencial del sector agrícola y ganadero en Castilla y León. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.spa
dc.relation.referencesHagelqvist, A., & Granström, K. (2016). Co-digestion of manure with grass silage and pulp and paper mill sludge using nutrient additions. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 37(16), 2113-2123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1142000spa
dc.relation.referencesHagos, K., Zong, J., Li, D., Liu, C., & Lu, X. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 1485-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto de Comercio Exterior de España. (2019). El mercado de la carne porcina en China. Oficina Económica y Comercial de la Embajada de España en Shanghái. Instituto de Comercio Exterior de España - ICEX España Exportación e Inversiones. E.P.E., M.P. Recuperado el 23 de 01 de 2023spa
dc.relation.referencesJia, B., Yun, S., Shi, J., Han, F., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Abbas, Y., Xu, H., Wang, K., & Xing, T. (2020). Enhanced anaerobic mono- and co-digestion under mesophilic condition: Focusing on the magnetic field and Ti-sphere core–shell structured additives. Bioresource Technology, 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123450spa
dc.relation.referencesKaparaju, P., & Rintala, J. (Enero de 2005). Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43(2), 175 - 188. doi:10.1016/S0921-3449(04)00119-3spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, M., Dutta, S., You, S., Luo, G., Zhang, S., Show, P. L., Sawarkar, A. D., Singh, L., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2021). A critical review on biochar for enhancing biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and sludge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 127143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127143spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, J. Kim, C. & Shin, J. (2017). Technology opportunity discovery to R&D planning: Key technological performance analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, Y., Kim, S.Y., Song, I., Park, Y. & Shin, J. (2014). Technology opportunity identification customized to the technological capability of SMEs through two-stage patent analysis. Scientometrics 100, p. 227–244.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, S., Yoon, B. & Park, Y. (2009). An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation 29, p. 481–497.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindorfer, H., Pérez López, C., Resch, C., Braun, R., & Kirchmayr, R. (2007). The impact of increasing energy crop addition on process performance and residual methane potential in anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology, 56(10), 55 - 63. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.728spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, R., Chen, X., Zhang, K., Han, Y., Tong, Y., Wang, J., Xiao, B., & Liu, J. (2022). Effect of mixing ratio and total solids content on temperature-phased anaerobic codigestion of rice straw and pig manure: Biohythane production and microbial structure. Bioresource Technology, 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126173spa
dc.relation.referencesLos Barbosa, F. J., Cabral, A. R., Capanema, M. A., & Schirmer, W. N. (2018). Biogas generation potential of anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid wastes and livestock manures. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 44(3), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2018.248spa
dc.relation.referencesMagama, P., Chiyanzu, I., & Mulopo, J. (2022). A parametric experimental validation of a biorefinery concept based on anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 16(4), 972-985. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2341spa
dc.relation.referencesMarchetti, R., Vasmara, C., & Fiume, F. (2019). Pig slurry improves the anaerobic digestion of waste cooking oil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 103(19), 8267-8279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10087-8spa
dc.relation.referencesMarchetti, R., Vasmara, C., Florio, G., & Borin, M. (2016). Biomethanation Potential of Wetland Biomass in Codigestion with Pig Slurry. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 7(5), 1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9515-3spa
dc.relation.referencesNordell, E., Nilsson, B., Nilsson Påledal, S., Karisalmi, K., & Moestedt, J. (2016). Co-digestion of manure and industrial waste - The effects of trace element addition. Waste Management, 47, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.032spa
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Latinoamericana de Energía. (2020). Situación del consumo energético a nivel mundial y para América Latina y el Caribe. Quito: Olade.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalop, F. y Vicente, J.M. (1999). Vigilancia Tecnológica e Inteligencia Competitiva. Su potencial para la empresa española. Fundación Cotec para la innovación tecnológica. Disponible en: http://www. delfos. co.cu/boletines/bsa/PDF/potencial_ vtec.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesParada, D. (2016). Evaluación del potencial de hidrógeno a partir de biomasa residual presente en Santander mediante procesos de codigestión anaerobia –estudio de caso. Bucaramanga: Universidad Santo Tomas Bucaramanga.spa
dc.relation.referencesPoulsen, T. G., & Adelard, L. (2016). Improving biogas quality and methane yield via co-digestion of agricultural and urban biomass wastes. Waste Management, 54, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.020spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez-Calvo, P., Triviño, A.C., Berges-García, A., Meneses-Chaux, J.M. & Martínez, J.F. (2013). Nuevas tecnologías en análisis de inteligencia competitiva. Casos prácticos. El profesional de la información, v. 22, n. 5, p. 448-454.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, A., Ángel, J., Rivero, E., Acevedo, P., Santis, A., Cabeza, I., Acosta, M., & Hernández, M. (2017). Evaluation of the biochemical methane potential of pig manure, organic fraction of municipal solid waste and cocoa industry residues in Colombia. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 57, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757010spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Abalde, Á., Flotats, X., & Fernández, B. (2017). Optimization of the anaerobic co-digestion of pasteurized slaughterhouse waste, pig slurry and glycerine. Waste Management, 61, 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.022spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-León, L. D., Ordoñez-Vásquez, K. M., & Quizhpe-Cordero, P. F. (2019). Estrategias para mitigar el impacto ambiental generado por la porcicultura hacia la contribución del desarrollo sostenible: Sitio Banasur, cantón Pasaje. Polo Del Conocimiento, 4(8), 51. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v4i8.1043spa
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez-Verde, I., Regueiro, L., Lema, J. M., & Carballa, M. (2018). Blending based optimisation and pretreatment strategies to enhance anaerobic digestion of poultry manure. Waste Management, 71, 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Bastida, R., & Cadavid-Rodriguez, L. (2022). Effect of nutrients, inoculum and co-substrates on methane potential of cattle manure. Revista Favultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20220990spa
dc.relation.referencesSaer, A. y González, L. (Coord.) (2019). Estrategia nacional de economía circular. Cierre de ciclos de materiales, innovación tecnológica, colaboración y nuevos modelos de negocio. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible; Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo.spa
dc.relation.referencesSahoo, A., & Bharti, R. (2022). A review in advancement of valorization and the treatment of bio-waste. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.11.405spa
dc.relation.referencesScharer, J. M., Moo-Young, M. B., & Fujita, M. (Mayo de 1981). Methane production by anaerobic digestion of animal manures. Biotechnology Letters, 3(5), 231 - 237. doi:10.1007/BF00154650spa
dc.relation.referencesSearch Technology, Inc. (2022). VantagePoint Academic 64-bit (versión 15.0) [software]. Norcross (Georgia, Estados Unidos): Search Technology, Inc. https://www.thevantagepoint.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesShabarish, S., Tamilarasan, K., J., R. B., & V., G. S. (2023). Biohydrogen production from macroalgae via sonic biosurfactant disintegration: An energy efficient approach. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 11, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESENV.2022.100093spa
dc.relation.referencesTampio, E., Ervasti, S., Paavola, T., & Rintala, J. (2016). Use of laboratory anaerobic digesters to simulate the increase of treatment rate in full-scale high nitrogen content sewage sludge and co-digestion biogas plants. Bioresource Technology, 220, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.058spa
dc.relation.referencesTavera-Ruiz, C., Martí-Herrero, J., Mendieta, O., Jaimes-Estévez, J., Gauthier-Maradei, P., Azimov, U., Escalante, H., & Castro, L. (2023). Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study. En Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 173). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113097spa
dc.relation.referencesTorrecilla del Rey, A. (2021). Potencial de distintos residuos orgánicos para la producción de biogás vía digestión y codigestión anaerobia. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.spa
dc.relation.referencesTran, N., Thao, H., Nguyen Vo Chau, N., & Ingvorsen, K. (2021). Bio-pretreatment Enhances Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Pig Manure. International Energy Journal, 21, 457-466.spa
dc.relation.referencesTripathi, S., Kairamkonda, M., Gupta, P., & Poluri, K. M. (2023). Dissecting the molecular mechanisms of producing biofuel and value-added products by cadmium tolerant microalgae as sustainable biorefinery approach. Chemical Engineering Journal, 454, 140068. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.140068spa
dc.relation.referencesUniversidad Nacional de Colombia. (2017). Estimación del potencial de conversión a biogás de la biomasa en Colombia y su aprovechamiento. Bogotá: Upmespa
dc.relation.referencesVila, C. P. (2021). Índice de Competitividad del Sector Porcícola en Colombia. (Tesis de maestría). Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración CESA, Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, M., Zhou, J., Yuan, Y.-X., Dai, Y.-M., Li, D., Li, Z.-D., Liu, X.-F., Zhang, X.-Y., & Yan, Z.-Y. (2017). Methane production characteristics and microbial community dynamics of mono-digestion and co-digestion using corn stalk and pig manure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(8), 4893-4901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.144spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., Li, G., Chi, M., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Jiang, S., & Cui, Z. (2018). Effects of co-digestion of cucumber residues to corn stover and pig manure ratio on methane production in solid state anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 250, 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.055spa
dc.relation.referencesWangliang, L., Zhikai, Z., & Guangwen, X. (2016). Enhancement of Biogas Yield of Poplar Leaf by High-Solid Codigestion with Swine Manure. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 179(2), 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-1992-0spa
dc.relation.referencesWeiser, T. R., Cremonez, P. A., Mattjie, A. C., Parisotto, E. I. B., Dieter, J., & Teleken, J. G. (2016). Produção de biogás a partir da codigestão de água residuária de suinocultura, vinhaça e glicerol bruto em reator com alimentação semicontínua. E-Xacta, 9(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.18674/exacta.v9i2.1934spa
dc.relation.referencesWong, M. H. (1990). Anaerobic digestion of pig manure mixed with sewage sludge. Biological Wastes, 31(3), 223 - 230. doi:10.1016/0269-7483(90)90161-Kspa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Q., Zeng, L., Fu, X., Pan, F., Shi, X., & Wang, T. (2021). Comparison of anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and sludge at different mixing ratios at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 337, 125425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.125425spa
dc.relation.referencesZhou, G.-N., Chen, L., Zheng, T., Zhou, Z.-Z., & Yuan, H.-R. (2019). Potential of anaerobic co-digestion of vinegar residue with different ratios of pig and chicken manure. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 38(6), 1357-1364. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2018-1329spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.localMagister en Ciencias y Tecnologías Ambientalesspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordPig manurespa
dc.subject.keywordcodigestionspa
dc.subject.keywordmethanespa
dc.subject.keywordanaerobic digestionspa
dc.subject.lembBiogasspa
dc.subject.lembquímica orgánicaspa
dc.subject.lembIndustria del metanol combustiblespa
dc.subject.proposalEstiércol de cerdospa
dc.subject.proposalcodigestiónspa
dc.subject.proposalmetanospa
dc.subject.proposaldigestión anaerobiaspa
dc.titlePotencial de la codigestión anaeróbica de sustratos y estiércol porcino hacia la producción de metanospa
dc.typemaster thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.localTesis de maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023karolmeza.pdf
Tamaño:
631.11 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023MezaKarol1.pdf
Tamaño:
208.37 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta aprobación facultad
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2023MezaKarol2.pdf
Tamaño:
4.99 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Acuerdo de Publicación
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría Ciencias y Tecnologías Ambientales