Contexto Como Modulador del Efecto de Bloqueo

dc.contributor.advisorArrubla Sánchez, Paola Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSerna Mahecha, Daniel Erasmo
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Santo Tomasspa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-0530
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T15:44:50Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T15:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-30
dc.descriptionEl efecto de bloqueo es un fenómeno que cambió la idea del aprendizaje por la idea tradicional de su ocurrencia por medio de un CS y un US con una contigüidad espacio-temporal, y agrega una nueva fuerza alternativa al condicionamiento clásico conocida como la ‘sorpresa’ (Beckers et al, 2016). Este efecto consiste en un fallo en el condicionamiento, al agregar un segundo CS a una asociación CS-US previamente establecida, lo que puede demostrar una competición de señales o la atención puesta a diferentes estímulos condicionales (Sanderson, Jones & amp; Austen, 2016). Por otro lado, el contexto o un ocassion setter (OS) se considera como la fuerza de un estímulo para modular la respuesta a un CS (Alfaro, Mallea, Laborda, Cañete y Miguez, 2018). De acuerdo a lo anterior, la presente investigación pretende determinar si el contexto influye en la ocurrencia del efecto de bloqueo en estudiantes de psicología de la universidad Santo Tomás - sede Villavicencio.spa
dc.description.abstractThe blocking effect is a phenomenon that changed the idea of learning for the traditional idea of its occurrence by means of a CS and a US with a space-time contiguity, and adds a new alternative force to classical conditioning known as 'surprise' (Beckers et al, 2016). This effect consists of a failure in conditioning, by adding a second CS to a previously established CS-US association, which can demonstrate a competition of signals or the attention paid to different conditioned stimuli (Sanderson, Jones & amp; Austen, 2016 ). On the other hand, the context or an occasion setter (OS) is considered as the strength of a stimulus to modulate the response to a CS (Alfaro, Mallea, Laborda, Cañete, & Miguez, 2018). According to the above, this research aims to determine if the context influences the occurrence of the blocking effect in psychology students at the Santo Tomás University - Villavicencio campus.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenamePsicólogospa
dc.description.domainhttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacionspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationSerna, D (2020). Contexto como modulador del efecto de bloqueo. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositoriospa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.cospa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/43943
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomásspa
dc.publisher.branchCRAI-USTA Villavicenciospa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Psicologíaspa
dc.publisher.programPregrado Psicologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAguado, L. (2003). Neuroscience of Pavlovian conditioning: a brief review. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 155-167. doi:10.1017/S1138741600005308spa
dc.relation.referencesAlfaro, F., Mallea, J., Laborda, M. A., Cañete, A., & amp; Miguez, G. (2018). Assessing the blocking of occasion setting. Behavioural processes, 154, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.008spa
dc.relation.referencesBalsam, P. D. (1985). The functions of context in learning and performance. Context and learning, 1-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaum, W.M. 2005. Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and education. Holden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802148881spa
dc.relation.referencesBoddez, Y., Haesen, K., Baeyens, F., & Beckers, T. (2014). Selectivity in associative learning: a cognitive stage framework for blocking and cue competition phenomena. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01305spa
dc.relation.referencesBouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20(3), 219.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1985). Contexts, event-memories, and extinction. Context and learning, 133-166.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouton, M. E., Todd, T. P., & León, S. P. (2014). Contextual control of discriminated operant behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(1), 92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fxan0000002spa
dc.relation.referencesBray, J. H. (2010). The future of psychology practice and science. American Psychologist, 65(5), 355–369. doi:10.1037/a0020273spa
dc.relation.referencesBreckler, S. (Julio de 2007). Translational psychology [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2007/07/ed-columnspa
dc.relation.referencesClark, R. E. (2004). The classical origins of Pavlov’s conditioning. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 39(4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734167spa
dc.relation.referencesCleland, L. M., Ruprecht, C. M., Lee, R. V., & Leising, K. J. (2017). The influence of landmark stability on control by occasion setters. Behavioural processes, 137, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.005spa
dc.relation.referencesChiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston, MA, US: Authors Cooperative.spa
dc.relation.referencesCraig, A. R., & Shahan, T. A. (2018). Multiple schedules, off‐baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 109(1), 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.300spa
dc.relation.referencesDelamater, A. R. (2004). Experimental extinction in Pavlovian conditioning: behavioural and neuroscience perspectives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 57(2), 97-132. DOI: 10.1080/02724990344000097spa
dc.relation.referencesDelamater, Andrew R., Garr, Eric, Lawrence, Samantha, Whitlow, Jesse W., Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.Behavioural Processes http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.013spa
dc.relation.referencesDelamater, A. R., Derman, R. C., & Harris, J. A. (2017). Superior ambiguous occasion setting with visual than temporal feature stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 43(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000122spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, D. (2016). Blocking in humans: Logical reasoning versus contingency learning. The Psychological Record, 66(1), 31-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0148-xspa
dc.relation.referencesDenniston, J. C., Savastano, H. I., & Miller, R. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. Handbook of contemporary learning theories, 3, 65-117.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, A. (2003). Los Paradigmas de Investigación en las Ciencias Sociales. ISLAS, 45(138), 125-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Batista, M. D. P. (2004). Metodología de la investigación 6ª edición.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, P. C., & Gallagher, M. (1993). Effects of amygdala central nucleus lesions on blocking and unblocking. Behavioral neuroscience, 107(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.107.2.235spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, N. M., Leung, H. T., & Westbrook, R. F. (2016). Counterconditioned fear responses exhibit greater renewal than extinguished fear responses. Learning & Memory, 23(4), 141-150. doi: 10.1101/lm.040659.115spa
dc.relation.referencesHouwer, J., Vandorpe, S., & Beckers, T. (2005). Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena. Learning & Behavior, 33(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196066spa
dc.relation.referencesJennings, D. J., & Bonardi, C. (2017). Blocking by fixed and variable stimuli: Effects of stimulus distribution on blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(9), 1964-1972. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1216574spa
dc.relation.referencesKattner, F., & Green, C. S. (2015). Cue competition in evaluative conditioning as a function of the learning process. Acta Psychologica, 162, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.013spa
dc.relation.referencesLeising, K. J., Hall, J. S., Wolf, J. E., & Ruprecht, C. M. (2015). Occasion setting during a spatial-search task with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000048spa
dc.relation.referencesMaes, E., Boddez, Y., Alfei Palloni, J. M., Krypotos, A. M., D’Hooge, R., De Houwer, J., &Beckers, T. (2016). The elusive nature of the blocking effect: 15 failures to replicate. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145, 49–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000200spa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, H. C., & Bucci, D. J. (2017). Negative occasion setting in juvenile rats. Behavioural processes, 137, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(4), 370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.370spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.363spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The Comparator Hypothesis: A Response Rule for The Expression of Associations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51–92. doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60038-9spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, R. R., & Witnauer, J. E. (2016). Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications. Behavioural processes, 123, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.001spa
dc.relation.referencesPlazas, E. A. (2006). BF Skinner: the seek of order in the voluntary behavior. Universitas Psychologica, 5(2), 371-384. ISSN 1657-9267spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Almonacid, Ricardo, & Peña Correal, Telmo Eduardo (2011). El supuesto de la continuidad conductual entre especies y la comprensión de la conducta humana. Suma Psicológica, 18(1),17-34. ISSN: 0121-4381. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=134218661003.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolack, C.W., Laborda, M.A., Miller, R.R., 2013. On the differences in degree of renewal produced by the different renewal designs. Behavioural Processes 99, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPoremba, A., Jones, D., & Gonzalez-Lima, F. (1997). Metabolic effects of blocking tone conditioning on the rat auditory system. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 68(2), 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1997.3792spa
dc.relation.referencesRichardson RA, Michener PN, Schachtman TR, Effects of Extinction of a Nontarget CS on Performance to a Target CS, Behavioural Processes (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.017spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Consuegra, F. (1993). El origen de la construcción fenomenalista: Mach, Moore y Whitehead. Enrahonar: quaderns de filosofia, 1993, núm. 20, p. 31-55. http://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.546spa
dc.relation.referencesSanderson, D. J., Jones, W. S., & Austen, J. M. (2016). The effect of the amount of blocking cue training on blocking of appetitive conditioning in mice. Behavioural Processes, 122, 36 – 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.007spa
dc.relation.referencesSchepers, S. T., & Bouton, M. E. (2017). Hunger as a context: food seeking that is inhibited during hunger can renew in the context of satiety. Psychological science, 28(11), 1640-1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719084spa
dc.relation.referencesStahlman, W. D., McWaters, M., Christian, E., Knapp, E., Fritch, A., & Mailloux, J. R. (2018). Overshadowing between visual and tactile stimulus elements in an object recognition task. Behavioural processes, 157, 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.008spa
dc.relation.referencesStock, A. K., Gohil, K., & Beste, C. (2017). Blocking effects in non-conditioned goal-directed behaviour. Brain Structure and Function, 222(6), 2807-2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1373-7spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, D. (2008). Reviewing the Comparator Hypothesis: A Distinctive Process of Performance. Online Submission.spa
dc.relation.referencesThrailkill, E. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2015). Contextual control of instrumental actions and habits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000045spa
dc.relation.referencesUrcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2014). The functions of contexts in associative learning. Behavioural processes, 104, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.008spa
dc.relation.referencesVernig, P. M. (2007). From science to practice: bridging the gap with translational research. APS Observer, 20(2). Recuperado de https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/from-science-to-practice-bridging-the-gap-with-translational-researchspa
dc.relation.referencesVila, N. Javier (2000). Extinción e inhibición en juicios de causalidad. Psicológica, 21(2),257-273. ISSN: 0211-2159. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16921203spa
dc.relation.referencesVila, Javier, & Monroy, Alberto (2016). Control contextual del escape discriminado con presentación sucesiva y simultánea de estímulos. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 42(1),57-74. ISSN: 0185-4534. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59346496004spa
dc.relation.referencesVogel, E. H., Glynn, J. Y., & Wagner, A. R. (2015). Cue competition effects in human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(12), 2327-2350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1014378spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, W. (2012). The Rescorla-Wagner Model, Simplified. Albion College. Recuperado de https://campus.albion.edu/wjwilson/files/2012/03/RWSimplified.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesZumalabe, J. M., & González, A. (2005). Una aproximación histórico-conceptual a la neurociencia de IP Pavlov. Boletín de psicología, 83, 45-67. ISSN 0212-8179spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keywordBlocking effectspa
dc.subject.keywordContextspa
dc.subject.keywordBehaviorismspa
dc.subject.lembAnálisis de conductaspa
dc.subject.lembConducta (Psicología)spa
dc.subject.lembAprendizaje - Psicologíaspa
dc.subject.lembPsicología - Investigacionesspa
dc.subject.lembTesis y disertaciones académicasspa
dc.subject.proposalEfecto de bloqueospa
dc.subject.proposalPsicología básicaspa
dc.subject.proposalContextospa
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis de conductaspa
dc.subject.proposalConductismospa
dc.titleContexto Como Modulador del Efecto de Bloqueospa
dc.typebachelor thesis
dc.type.categoryFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driveinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.localTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022danielserna.pdf
Tamaño:
594.97 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de Grado
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022danielserna1.pdf
Tamaño:
21.03 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Autorización Facultad
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022danielserna2.pdf
Tamaño:
328.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Derechos de Autor

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
807 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: