Medición del valor agregado para la educación superior en Bogotá

Rodríguez Revilla, Ramiro

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15332/tg.mae.2020.0747

Medición del valor agregado para la educación superior en Bogotá

dc.contributor.advisor	Junca Rodríguez, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.contributor.author	Rodríguez Revilla, Ramiro
dc.contributor.cvlac	https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000508152
dc.date.accessioned	2015-11-09T15:53:30Z
dc.date.accessioned	2017-02-13T15:44:47Z
dc.date.accessioned	2017-06-24T16:13:15Z
dc.date.available	2015-11-09T15:53:30Z
dc.date.available	2017-02-13T15:44:47Z
dc.date.available	2017-06-24T16:13:15Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08-03
dc.description	En este documento se presenta un modelo que mide el valor agregado o efecto escuela para la educación superior en Bogotá utilizado para evaluar la calidad del sistema educativo en este nivel, aislando los conocimientos previos adquiridos por los estudiantes en la educación básica y media y los factores familiares, sociales y económicos, de tal manera que es posible calcular realmente la efectividad del factor institucional que determina un valor agregado para el estudiante. Para llevar a cabo esta medición se utiliza una estimación de modelos lineales jerárquicos con variables instrumentales a partir de las bases de datos suministradas por el Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación y el Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. El resultado del modelo indica que el desempeño académico de los estudiantes está explicado en un 71% por factores asociados a las universidades y en un 29% a factores sociales, económicos y conocimientos previos. Así mismo, se llega a la conclusión de que la Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, la Universidad de la Sabana y la Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, que ocupaban las posiciones 13, 20 y 32 en la clasificación con la metodología de promedio simple sean las 3 primeras instituciones respectivamente, que mayor valor agregado han aportado a sus estudiantes en Bogotá en el periodo 2007 – 2012.	eng
dc.description.abstract	This paper presents a model that measures the added value or school effect for higher education in Bogotá used to evaluate the quality of the education system at this level, isolating the prior knowledge acquired by students in basic and secondary education and family, social and economic factors, in such a way that it is possible to actually calculate the effectiveness of the institutional factor that determines an added value for the student. To carry out this measurement, an estimation of hierarchical linear models with instrumental variables is used from the databases provided by the Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of Education and the National Administrative Department of Statistics. The results of the model indicate that 71% of students' academic performance is explained by factors associated with universities and 29% by social, economic and prior knowledge factors. It also concludes that the Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, the Universidad de la Sabana and the Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, which occupied positions 13, 20 and 32 in the ranking using the simple average methodology, are the top 3 institutions, respectively, that have provided the greatest added value to their students in Bogotá in the period 2007 - 2012.
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.identifier.doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.15332/tg.mae.2020.0747
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co	spa
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/11634/301
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Santo Tomás	spa
dc.publisher.branch	CRAI-USTA Bogotá	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Economía	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría Ciencias Económicas	spa
dc.relation.references	Aitkin, M., Anderson, D. y Hinde, J. (1981). “Statistical modeling of data on teaching styles”.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, 148-161.
dc.relation.references	Aitkin, M. y Longford, N. (1986). “Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 149, 1-43.
dc.relation.references	Banco Mundial (2008).“La calidad de la educación en Colombia: un análisis y algunas opciones para un programa de política”. Documento del Banco Mundial.
dc.relation.references	Barro, J. y Lee, J. (2013) “A new data set of educational attainment in the world 1950 2010”, Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198.
dc.relation.references	Benhabib, J. y Spiegel, M. (1994) “The role of human capital in Economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross – country data”. Journal of Monetary Economics. 34(2), 143 – 174.
dc.relation.references	Braun, H., Chudowsky, N. and Koenig, J., (2010). Getting value out of value-added. The National Academies Press. Washington D.C.
dc.relation.references	Bryk, A. y Raudenbush, S., (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 1ra ed. Sage Publications. Newbury Park, C.A.
dc.relation.references	Castello-Climent, A. e Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A. (2012) “The role of educational quality and quantity in the process of economic development”, Economics of education review, 31, 391-409
dc.relation.references	Chica, S., Galvis, D. y Ramírez, A. (2011). “Determinantes del rendimiento académico en Colombia pruebas ICFES Saber 11”, Documentos de trabajo Economía y Finanzas, 11-05
dc.relation.references	Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, R., y York, R. (1966) Equality of educational opportunity. Government Printing Office. Washington D.C. U.S.
dc.relation.references	Correa, J. (2004). “Determinantes del Rendimiento Educativo de los Estudiantes de Secundaria en Cali: un análisis multinivel”. Revista Sociedad y Economía. 6, 81-105.
dc.relation.references	Courgeau, D. (2007). Multilevel synthesis. Springer – Verlag. Dordrecht.
dc.relation.references	Dempster, A., Laird, N. y Rubin, D. (1977). “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM Algorithm”.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series B, Vol. 39, No. 1. 138
dc.relation.references	Draper, D. (1995). “Inference and hierarchical modelling in social sciences”. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(2), 115-149.
dc.relation.references	Fundación Compartir (2014). Tras la excelencia docente. Bogotá.
dc.relation.references	Gaviria, A. y Barrientos, J. (2001). Determinantes de la calidad de la educación en Colombia”. Archivos de Economía. 159. Departamento Nacional de Planeación
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H. (1986) “Multilevel linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares”, Biometrika, 73, 43-56.
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. 1ra ed. Oxford Press. Griffin. London and New York.
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H. y Spiegelhalter, D. (1996). “League tables and their limitations: statistical issues in comparison of institutional performance”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 159, 385-443.
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H., Huiqi, P., Rtah, T. y Hill, N. (2000).“The use of value-added information in judging school performance”. Perspectives on Education Policy. Institute of Education. University of London.
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H. (2001). “Using pupil performance data for judging school and teachers: scope and limitations”. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 4433-4442.
dc.relation.references	Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel Stastistical Models.4th edition.Wiley. U.K.
dc.relation.references	Hanchane, S., y Mostafa, T. (2012).“Solving endogeneity problems in multilevel estimation: an example using education production functions”. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39, 1101–1114.
dc.relation.references	Hanushek, E. y Luque, J. (2003). “Efficiency and equity in schools around the world”. Economics of Education Review. 22(5): 481-502.
dc.relation.references	Hanushek, E., Kain, J., Rivkin, S., y Branch, G. (2007) “Charter School Quality and Parental Decision Making with School Choice”. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5-6), 823–848.
dc.relation.references	Hanushek, E. y Woessmann, L. (2009). “Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation”, NBER Working Paper 14633.
dc.relation.references	Hanushek, E. y Zhang, L. (2009). “Quality consistent estimates of international schooling and skill gradients”. Journal of Human Capital, 3 (2), 107-143.
dc.relation.references	Hanushek, E. y Rivkin, S. (2012). “The distribution of Teacher Quality and implications for Policy”. Annual Review of Economics. 131-157
dc.relation.references	Hernández, G. (2010). “¿Cuán rentable es la educacion superior en Colombia?”. Lecturas de Economía. 73, 181-214.
dc.relation.references	ICFES (2010). “Colombia en PISA 2009. Síntesis de resultados
dc.relation.references	ICFES (2013). “Colombia en PISA 2012. Síntesis de resultados
dc.relation.references	ICFES (2013b). “Sistema Nacional de Evaluación Estandarizada de la Educación”. Alineación del examen Saber 11.
dc.relation.references	Jola, A. (2011). “Determinantes de la calidad de la educación media en Colombia”. Coyuntura Económica, XLI (1): 25-61.
dc.relation.references	Lindley, D. y Smith A. (1972) “Bayes estimates for the linear model”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 1-41.
dc.relation.references	Longford, N.T. (1993). Random Coefficient models. Oxford. Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references	Lucas, R. (1989). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, NBER Working Paper, R1176.
dc.relation.references	Macfrey, D., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D., Louis, T., Hamilton, L. (2004) “Models for ValueAdded Modeling of Teacher Effects”. Journal of Education and BehavoirStatistics.29(1), 67–101.
dc.relation.references	Mankiw, N. Romer, D. y Weil, D. (1992). “A contribution to the empirics of economic growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 407-437.
dc.relation.references	Manzi, J., San Martin, E. y Van Bellegem, S. (2012). “School system evaluation by value added analysis under endogeneity”. Mimeo.
dc.relation.references	Meghir, C. y Rivkin, S. (2011). “Econometric Methods for research in Education”.Handbook of the Economics of Education.Volume 3.
dc.relation.references	Meyer, R. (1997) “Value-Added Indicators of School Performance: A Primer”, Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 283–301.
dc.relation.references	Mincer, J. (1974). The Human Capital Earnings Function NBER Chapters, en: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc :83-96.
dc.relation.references	OECD (2008). Best practices to assess the value added of schools. Paris. Francia.
dc.relation.references	Orjuela, J. (2010). “Determinantes individuales de desempeño en las pruebas de Estado para educación media en Colombia”. ICFES.
dc.relation.references	Rabe – Hesketh, S. y Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling using Stata. Volume I: Continous responses. Third edition. College Station. Texas.
dc.relation.references	RAND Corporation. (2013). Teachers Matter: Understanding Teachers’ Impact on Student Achievement.
dc.relation.references	Raudenbush, S. y Willms J. (1995). ”The estimation of school effects”. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20, 307-335.
dc.relation.references	Raudenbush, S. y Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.references	Raudenbush, S. (2004) “What Are Value-Added Models Estimating and What Does This Imply for Statistical Practice?” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 121–129.
dc.relation.references	Rodríguez, R. (2014). Econometria I y II. Bogotá.
dc.relation.references	Romer, P.(1986).“Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth”.Journal of Political Economy. 94(5),1002-1037.
dc.relation.references	Romer, P. (1990). “Endogenous technological change”. Journal of Political Economy. 99(5), 71-102.
dc.relation.references	Rouse, C. E., Hannaway, J., Goldhaber, D., y Figlio, D. (2007). “Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure”. Working Paper 13681, National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.relation.references	Ruiz de Miguel, C. y Castro, M (2006). “Un estudio multinivel basado en PISA 2003: factores de eficacia escolar en el área de matemáticas”. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 14(29).
dc.relation.references	San Martin, E. y Carrasco, A. (2012).“Clasificación de escuelas en la nueva institucionalidad educativa: contribución de modelos de valor agregado para una responsabilización justa”. Centro de Políticas Públicas UC.Chile, 7(53).
dc.relation.references	Sanders, W. (2000). “Value Added Assessment from Student Achievement Data, Opportunities and Hurdles”, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 329-339
dc.relation.references	Smith A. (1973). ”A general Bayesian linear model”.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.35(1), 67-75.
dc.relation.references	Thieme, C., Tortosa-Ausina, E., Prior, D. Gempp, R. (2013). “Valor agregado multinivel y factores contextuales en educación una comparación no paramétrica robusta”. Mimeo.
dc.relation.references	Timmermans, A., Doolaard, S., y Wolf, I., (2011). “Conceptual and empirical differences among various value added models for accountability”. School effectiveness and school improvement, 22(4), 393-413.
dc.relation.references	Willms, D. y Raudenbush, S. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability”. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 209232.
dc.relation.references	Willms, D. y Raudenbush, S. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability”. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 209232.
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.local	Abierto (Texto Completo)	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.subject.keyword	Higher education -- Bogotá (Colombia)
dc.subject.keyword	Quality of education -- Bogotá (Colombia)
dc.subject.keyword	Curriculum evaluation -- Bogotá (Colombia)
dc.subject.keyword	Curriculum research -- Bogotá (Colombia)
dc.subject.proposal	Educación superior -- Bogotá (Colombia)	eng
dc.subject.proposal	Calidad de la educación -- Bogotá (Colombia)	eng
dc.subject.proposal	Evaluación curricular -- Bogotá (Colombia)	eng
dc.subject.proposal	Investigación curricular -- Bogotá (Colombia)	eng
dc.subject.proposal	Instituciones educativas	eng
dc.title	Medición del valor agregado para la educación superior en Bogotá	eng
dc.type	master thesis
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversion	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.drive	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local	Tesis de maestría	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion